The Law of Unintended Consequences

It was meant to be a landmark moment for internet safety in the United Kingdom. After years of contentious debate, parliamentary wrangling, and fierce lobbying from all sides, the Online Safety Act (OSA) finally came into force. Its primary mission was noble and widely supported: to erect a digital barrier protecting children from accessing explicit material online. The mechanism chosen was mandatory age verification, a system requiring users to prove they are over 18 before accessing adult content, often by providing official identification like a driver’s licence or credit card details.

The government and the regulatory body, Ofcom, celebrated the move as a decisive step towards a safer internet. They envisioned a new era where the most vulnerable would be shielded, and platforms would be held accountable. What they didn’t seem to anticipate was the powerful, visceral reaction of millions of ordinary, privacy-conscious adults who, when faced with the choice of surrendering their personal data or finding another way, overwhelmingly chose the latter. The immediate aftermath wasn’t a sanitised web, but a chaotic digital exodus that has left cybersecurity experts deeply concerned.

The first seismic shockwave was felt by Aylo, the parent company of Pornhub and other major adult platforms. In a statement to the BBC that sent ripples through the tech and policy worlds, the company revealed that in the weeks following the OSA’s implementation in late July 2025, traffic from the UK to its flagship site had plummeted by an astonishing 77%. Did an entire nation’s interest in adult entertainment simply evaporate overnight? Aylo thinks not. “To believe that people have just stopped is fundamentally naive,” remarked Alex Kekesi, a vice president at the company. “What we are witnessing is a mass displacement. Users are fleeing to the dark corners of the internet, to the thousands of sites that are not compliant, that have no intention of complying, and that offer none of the safeguards we do.”

A Digital Migration to the Wild West

The scale of this migration is staggering. The online adult entertainment industry is a behemoth, with global revenues projected to exceed $120 billion by 2026. Within this ecosystem, there are an estimated quarter of a million platforms, ranging from corporate giants like Aylo’s properties to small, obscure operations run from jurisdictions with lax regulations. Kekesi’s assertion that non-compliant sites have seen “exponential growth” is a direct challenge to the official narrative. It suggests that the OSA hasn’t eliminated the demand but has instead rerouted it, pushing a significant portion of the UK’s 20 million regular consumers of adult content from well-lit, moderated platforms into a digital Wild West, where malware, scams, and data exploitation are rampant.

This isn’t just about pornography; it’s a case study in human behaviour and digital privacy. For many, the prospect of creating a permanent, verifiable link between their official government identity and their private online viewing habits was a line they would not cross. “I’m a 40-year-old accountant with a mortgage and a family,” one user wrote on a popular UK technology forum. “I’m not a criminal, and I’m not doing anything illegal. But the idea of my name and driver’s licence number being stored on a database connected to my viewing history? Absolutely not. It’s a data breach waiting to happen.” This sentiment, echoed across social media and forums, became the catalyst for the widespread adoption of workarounds.

The Rise of the Digital Ghost: VPNs as the New Norm

The primary tool in this mass circumvention has been the Virtual Private Network, or VPN. Once the preserve of tech enthusiasts and corporate employees, VPNs have exploded into the mainstream. In simple terms, a VPN creates a secure, encrypted tunnel for your internet traffic, routing it through a server in another country. To a website, it appears as though you are browsing from that server’s location—be it Amsterdam, Zurich, or New York—effectively bypassing the UK’s geo-fenced age verification requirements. The result is seamless access, with no ID required.

Major VPN providers reported a surge in UK subscriptions that correlated almost perfectly with the OSA’s implementation date. “The spike was immediate and undeniable,” confirms Laura Tyrylytė, Head of Public Relations at Nord Security, a leading player in the VPN market. “It’s a classic example of the ‘Streisand Effect’ in action. By trying to control and restrict access, the authorities inadvertently made millions of people more tech-savvy about privacy tools. They haven’t stopped watching; they’ve just learned how to become digital ghosts.” This rush to anonymity, however, has opened a new and far more insidious Pandora’s box of risks.

Not All Cloaks Are Created Equal: The Perilous World of Free VPNs

In the frantic search for a solution, many users have been lured by the promise of “free” VPN services. Cybersecurity experts warn that this is where the real danger lies. A reputable, subscription-based VPN operates on a clear business model: you pay a fee for a secure, private service. Their reputation depends on not logging your activity and protecting your data. Free VPNs, on the other hand, have a different, more opaque model.

“If you’re not paying for the product, you are the product,” explains Dr. Ben Carter, a cybersecurity analyst and author of ‘The Data Trade’. “These free services have to make money somehow. Many do so by harvesting your data. They log every website you visit, your connection times, your real IP address, and sometimes even inject their own ads or tracking cookies into your browser. This data is then anonymised—often poorly—and sold in bulk to data brokers, advertisers, and analytics firms. The very privacy you sought to protect is being packaged and sold to the highest bidder.”

The risks go beyond data harvesting. A 2021 study by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) in Australia analysed over 280 free Android VPN apps and found that nearly 40% contained some form of malware or malvertising. Furthermore, many of these services are based in countries like China or Russia, with poor data protection laws and potential links to state surveillance agencies. “Users are essentially trading a requirement to show ID to a regulated company for a system where an unknown entity in a hostile jurisdiction can monitor their entire internet activity,” warns Tyrylytė. “It’s a catastrophic trade-off.”

The Official Narrative vs. The Digital Reality

Faced with this evidence, Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, has remained steadfast. In a statement to the press, an Ofcom spokesperson asserted that the law is “working as intended,” primarily by making it significantly harder for children to stumble upon adult material. The agency also claimed that its own data showed a decrease in VPN usage since the initial July peak and an overall drop in traffic to pornography sites in general across the UK.

However, when pressed for details on this data—the methodology, sample size, and specific figures—Ofcom declined to comment on the record. This refusal has drawn criticism from transparency advocates and tech journalists, who argue that without verifiable data, the official claims are impossible to scrutinise. The on-the-ground evidence from VPN providers, analytics firms, and the adult industry itself paints a starkly different picture: one of a compliant market shrinking while an unmonitored, non-compliant market booms. The government may have successfully cleaned up the high street, but in doing so, it has inadvertently fostered a sprawling, unregulated black market in the back alleys of the internet.

A Chilling Effect on Digital Freedom?

Beyond the immediate consequences for the adult industry lies a deeper, more troubling question about the future of the internet in the UK. Privacy advocates and digital rights organisations have long warned that the OSA’s age verification mandate sets a dangerous precedent.

“Today it’s pornography, but what about tomorrow?” asks Eva Patel, policy director at the UK-based Digital Liberty Foundation. “Will you need to verify your age to access social media, to read news articles about sensitive topics, to participate in political debate, or to buy alcohol online? Each step normalises the idea that anonymous browsing is inherently suspicious and that citizens must present their digital papers to engage in lawful online activities. This is a fundamental erosion of the principle of a free and open internet.”

Critics argue that the legislation, while well-intentioned, fundamentally misunderstands the architecture of the web and the global nature of information. It imposes a national solution on a borderless network, a tactic that often proves futile and counterproductive. The battle over the Online Safety Act is, therefore, more than just a debate about explicit content. It is the frontline in a much larger war over digital identity, surveillance, and the right to privacy in the 21st century. As the government celebrates a victory in its campaign to protect children, it may have unknowingly sacrificed a core tenet of adult freedom, pushing millions of its citizens into a riskier, unmonitored digital world where the only winners are the data harvesters and the purveyors of malware. The long-term impact on the nation’s cybersecurity and digital rights remains to be seen, but the initial signs suggest a pyrrhic victory at best.

—

Source: https://www.techradar.com